Services & selected work

Purpose, put into practice

I turn complex social-impact work into well-run programs, dependable systems, and connected communities. Here’s what that looks like in practice.

01

Process automation

Less copying and chasing. More time for the work that matters. I connect tools, organize information, and build workflows that keep running.

02

Program leadership

From the first needs assessment to the final report. I bring people, plans, budgets, and priorities together — and keep the whole program moving.

03

Project operations

The detail behind dependable delivery. I coordinate contractors, events, logistics, reporting, and communications so nothing falls through the cracks.

04

Community building

Belonging, not just membership. I build inclusive spaces, meaningful peer learning, and the operational backbone that helps communities thrive.

Selected case studies

What I did. What changed.

6 case studies
UN World Food Programme2023–2024

One source of truth. Lasting value.

An information system that brings innovation partner data together — and stays useful long after handover.

70+ partners

Connected in one reporting database

I-TECH Tanzania2013–2015

A health training program built to last.

Leading Tanzania’s first tablet-based blended clinical course — with equity and sustainability built into the design.

30% → 0%

Learner attrition, with 100% graduation

SciDev.Net / CABI2025–present

The detail that makes learning happen.

Coordinating people, technology, and delivery behind a multi-country science communication program.

40+ learning events

Supported, alongside a 6-country journalist network

Edge Effect2024–2025

A community with a voice — and influence.

Building a global LGBTQIA+ Community of Practice around safety, inclusion, and member-led participation.

33% → 80%

Annual survey response rate

Maliasili2025

Peer support that no longer needs me.

Giving conservation leaders a practical structure to work through real challenges together.

Member-owned

Quarterly case clinics, run autonomously

AUDA-NEPAD / GIZ2019–2022

Keeping a regional program connected.

Coordinating donor engagement and an equity-minded capacity-strengthening approach across countries.

12 countries

A donor engagement program spanning 4 years

ILLUSTRATIVE WORK SAMPLE · NOT A CLIENT RESULT

Community engagement plan

From a network
to a community.

A sample 90-day engagement plan for a distributed community of social-impact practitioners. The goal: help members find relevant peers, exchange practical knowledge, and gradually take ownership of the space. Activities and measures would be co-designed with members.

DAYS 01–30

Listen & build trust

  • Interview members about priorities, barriers, and what belonging looks like.
  • Map languages, time zones, accessibility needs, and existing connections.
  • Co-create community guidelines and a consent-based onboarding journey.
  • Welcome each member personally and connect them with a relevant peer.

Deliverables: Member needs map, shared guidelines, onboarding checklist, and baseline survey.

DAYS 31–60

Create a rhythm

  • Run a facilitated case clinic around a member’s real challenge.
  • Share a weekly digest of member questions, resources, and opportunities.
  • Rotate live session times and offer asynchronous participation.
  • Invite members to host focused discussions and share practical work.

Deliverables: Co-created content calendar, first case clinic, weekly digest, and feedback check-in.

DAYS 61–90

Share ownership

  • Support member hosts with a repeatable session guide and role checklist.
  • Introduce members pursuing shared challenges or collaborations.
  • Review participation and belonging data with the community.
  • Agree the next quarter’s priorities and a rotating host schedule.

Deliverables: Member-hosted session, peer-support guide, engagement review, and next-quarter plan.

Measure value,
not just activity.

Track onboarding completion, repeat participation, member-to-member replies, and representation across languages and time zones. Ask what members applied in their work, whether they feel safe contributing, and what collaborations emerged. Establish targets after the baseline — rather than inventing success numbers.

Have a program with
many moving parts?

Let’s talk